← Index

GATEAgents & automation

Agent loops make a full LLM call even for a simple yes/no decision — that's a lot of waste.

Pattern Jev AI decision making

Agent loops make a full LLM call even for a simple yes/no decision — that's a lot of waste. Here's a different way to handle those decisions. Title: Building a Harness with Jev URL: langchain.com/blog/building-a-harness-with ❓ What's new about Jev? 💡 It's a "System One model" from TypeSafe AI that doesn't generate text at all. You feed it a state and a set of questions, and it returns typed answers with probabilities. ❓ How is it different from a regular LLM? 💡 It's trained via reinforcement learning and specializes in three question types: Choice (pick from options), Score (rate on a scale), and Noul (yes/no). Bundling multiple questions into one call barely adds latency or cost. ❓ Where would you actually use this? 💡 Two big ones: model routing (send simple tasks to cheap fast models, hard ones to capable models) and guardrails (checking risk before letting an agent run something like a bash command). ❓ How much does it really help? 💡 On classification tasks it reports 200x faster inference and 400x lower cost, and it's already running in production for browser automation, live trading agents, and large-scale email classification. #AIAgents #LangChain